Universal Access To All Knowledge
Home Donate | Store | Blog | FAQ | Jobs | Volunteer Positions | Contact | Bios | Forums | Projects | Terms, Privacy, & Copyright
Search: Advanced Search
Anonymous User (login or join us)
Upload

Reply to this post | See parent post | Go Back
View Post [edit]

Poster: TrexRanger Date: Mar 26, 2009 11:24am
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: Best quality Recording on the archive

well, I'll tell you something, Supper....... this one might even taste funny to you >

http://www.archive.org/details/coc2008-04-04.sbd

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: high flow Date: Mar 26, 2009 11:37am
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: Best quality Recording on the archive

I have a friend, who hangs here at LMA regularly. He's a real pain in the ass.....he always insists that this....

http://www.archive.org/details/gd1978-04-16.sbd.cantor.motb.81457.sbeok.flac16

....is the finest sbd recording here at LMA. This guy knows everything so........

BTW, I don't like to mention names, but his initials are elbow1126.

This post was modified by high flow on 2009-03-26 18:37:49

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: daliguana Date: Mar 26, 2009 6:09pm
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: Best quality Recording on the archive

Photobucket
Photobucket

thanks to tigerbolt for the covers

This post was modified by daliguana on 2009-03-27 01:09:16

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: daliguana Date: Mar 26, 2009 6:03pm
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: Best quality Recording on the archive

spreadin' 'em 'round today:
Photobucket

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: craven714 Date: Mar 26, 2009 11:56am
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: Best quality Recording on the archive

I second that high flow and Larry

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: William Tell Date: Mar 26, 2009 1:01pm
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: Best quality Recording on the archive

I've always thought that the quality of 9-19-70 is amazing; really crisp and clean.

One thing--for me there are three variables: 1) quality of recording (ie, hiss, diginoise, etc.); 2) mix and errors (ie, someone is low/high, cuts, etc.); and 3) quality of show. Somehow, 1 & 2 seem different to me.

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: daliguana Date: Mar 26, 2009 6:13pm
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: Best quality Recording on the archive

Photobucket
Photobucket
Photobucket
Photobucket

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: William Tell Date: Mar 26, 2009 7:35pm
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: Best quality Recording on the archive

Cool! Like the "eyetest" (?) portion!

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: high flow Date: Mar 26, 2009 1:13pm
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: Best quality Recording on the archive

1 = acts of god
2 = acts of stoned sound engineers

My own opinion of greatest GD recordings is different than that dude I mentioned. I like the June 1976 shows. 6/11, 6/14 and 6/15. Beautiful Bettys.

This post was modified by high flow on 2009-03-26 20:13:51

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: elbow1126 Date: Mar 26, 2009 4:55pm
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: Best quality Recording on the archive

yeah but do you know?

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: daliguana Date: Mar 26, 2009 6:22pm
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: Best quality Recording on the archive

Photobucket
Photobucket
Photobucket
Photobucket

and see attached for 6-11

Attachment: 061176cover.pdf
Attachment: 061176tray.pdf

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: johnnyonthespot Date: Mar 27, 2009 11:01am
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: Best quality Recording on the archive

one and two are different Tell. Something can be perfect sonically but if the mix was screwed that's just the way it is and can't be made better. An example is 5-3-69, the AUD is amazing for that time period but no vocals. I would still rate it as a very high quaslity recording.

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: William Tell Date: Mar 27, 2009 11:32am
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: Best quality Recording on the archive

"I know THAT!" (Inspector Clouseau voice).

"Quaslity": proun "qua-z Lit e"

A measure of the combined forces of 1 (overall tape quality) and 2 (human error) in the ranking of DEAD show recordings.

Etymology: attributed by various sources to Johnny on the Spot, LMA GD forum, crica 2009.

Yeah, J--I agree, obviously, that you can sep these two components, and often do when ranking in my mind...

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: babygirl24 Date: Mar 28, 2009 8:04am
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: ruth_4fred@yahoo.com

ruth_4fred@yahoo.com

HELLO
My name is miss ruth i saw your profile today at (www.archive.org)and became intrested in you,i will also like to know you more,and i want you to send an email to my email address so i can give you my picture, for you to know whom i am.
Here is my email address (ruth_4fred@yahoo.com)
I believe we can move from here!
I am waiting for your mail to my email address above.
ruth
(Remeber the distance or colour does not matter but love matters alot in life)

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: fenario80 Date: Mar 26, 2009 3:08pm
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: Best quality Recording on the archive

Very nice show, I just streamed the whole thing - crazy long drums/space for 1978 ...